Sall v. U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner: Ndiaga Sall
Respondent: U.S. Attorney General
Case Number: 4:2026cv02133
Filed: September 2, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: David A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order. The Court orders Respondent(s) to file a Notice within 7 days of the date of this Order indicating whether they intend to oppose the Petition and, if so, setting forth a brief explanation as to how the present petition differs from those under the Court of Appeals' consideration in Lopez-Campos. If an opposition is intended, the Return of Writ shall be filed within 14 days from the date of this Order--no later than 9/16/2026. Requests for extension should be restricted to exceptional circumstances. Petitioner may file a reply within 7 days of the Return of Writ. If necessary, the Court may thereafter schedule a hearing. The Clerk of Court must forward a copy of the #1 petition and any attachments together with this Order, to the Office of the United States Attorney, Northern District of Ohio. Judge David A. Ruiz on 9/2/2026. (G,CA)
September 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order granting Petitioner's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Judge David A. Ruiz on 9/2/2026. (G,CA)
September 2, 2026 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Ndiaga Sall. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(D,Ju)
September 2, 2026 Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal ICE custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Ndiaga Sall. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (D,Ju)
September 2, 2026 Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (D,Ju)
September 2, 2026 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (D,Ju)
September 2, 2026 Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Ndiaga Sall #A245741677 at Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, OH 44505 on 9/2/2026. Related document(s) #1 . (D,Ju)
September 2, 2026 Copy of #3 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Order, mailed to Ndiaga Sall #A245741677, Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, Oh 44505; and a copy of #1 Petition, #3 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Order, emailed to the Office of U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Ohio on 9/2/2026. (G,CA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sall v. U.S. Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ndiaga Sall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?