Singh v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al.
| Parmvir Singh |
| Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director, Attorney General of the United States, Warden Kenneth Hoover and ICE Detroit Field Office Director |
| 4:2026cv02140 |
| September 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Patricia A Gaughan |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion for attorney Mohammad Akif Saleem to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-13859776, filed by Petitioner Parmvir Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Mohammad Saleem, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)(Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief by a person in federal ICE custody. Filing fee paid $ 5, receipt number AOHNDC-13859439.. Filed by Parmvir Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| District Judge Patricia A Gaughan assigned to case. (M,Do) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (M,Do) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.