Hintson v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
T. David Hintson |
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, BASF Corporation, BASF Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline plc and SmithKline Beecham Corporation |
5:2003cv08000 |
February 24, 2003 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James S Gwin (MDL1481) |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2006. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Order terming case pursuant to the Court's 7/7/2004, Memorandum and Opinion and Order and the 5/16/2006, decision entered by the Sixth Circuit of Appeals. (See 02-8000, document number 360).(S, J) |
Filing 3 Answer to Complaint of Jeannie Adair, et al. (S. D. Calif. Case No. 03 CV 0549 L RBB) with Separate and Affirmative Defenses filed by BASF Corporation. (Wiese, Philip) |
Filing 2 Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Knoll Pharmaceutical Company. (Wall, Brett) |
Filing 1 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-3) by Michael J. Beck, Clerk of Panel transferring case pursuant to 28:1407 from the Southern District of Mississippi to the Northern District of Ohio (complete record on file in clerk's office) (Attachments: #1 Complaint (MSS)# (2) Docket Sheet (MSS))(S, R) |
Reference must be made to the "master" docket sheet (5:02-8000) for entries common to two or more actions. (S, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.