GED Integrated Solutions, Inc. et al v. Durotech International, Inc.
5:2006cv01327 |
May 30, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Akron Office |
John R. Adams |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 Memorandum of Opinion denying plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. # 86 ), granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion (Doc. # 82 ); Defendant's request for declaration of noninfringement is denied a s moot; Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to invalidity issue is granted; Judgement is granted in favor of defendant, and claims 9 and 10 of the 761 patent and claim 1 of the 377 patent are found to be invalid. Judge John R. Adams on 3/3/09. (K,C) Modified text on 3/4/2009 (K,C). |
Filing 111 Order denying Defendant's Motion to exclude evidence(Related Doc # 89 ) used in support of Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Judge John R. Adams on 1/30/09.(L, J) |
Filing 78 Memorandum of Opinion granting Plaintiffs' Motion for partial summary judgment on Counts III, IV, and V of Defendant's counterclaim (Related Doc # 52 ). Signed by Judge John R. Adams on 4/29/08. (L, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: GED Integrated Solutions, Inc. et al v. Durotech International, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.