Youngstown Osteopathic Hospital Association v. Sandrock, et al.
5:2006cv01900 |
August 8, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Akron Office |
Peter C. Economus |
Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Motion for Withdrawal of Reference (U. S. Bankruptcy Court)(see U.S.D.C., N/OH 5:06mc5 related case). Parties are scheduled to appear before the Court on August 14, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. for a status conference, co unsel shall appear in person; the parties shall submit position papers to the Court and opposing counsel two days in advance of the conference. Signed by Judge Peter C. Economus on 8/8/06.(R, Li) (Entered: 08/08/2006) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover S heet # 2 U.S.B.C. N/OH 99-40663 docket # 3 Adversary Proceeding 02-6118 docket # 4 U.S.D.C., N/OH 06mc05 docket # 5 Motion to Withdraw Reference to Bankruptcy court with Memorandum in Support).(R, Li) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2006 (R, Li). Modified to add attachment on 8/10/2006 (R, Li). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Youngstown Osteopathic Hospital Association v. Sandrock, et al. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.