Pirolozzi v. Stanbro et al
Plaintiff: Troy Pirolozzi
Defendant: Eric Stanbro, William Guthrie, Jerry Fuelling, Shawn Overdorf, Thomas Hopkins, City of Canton, Bureau of Tobacco and Firearms and United States of America
Case Number: 5:2007cv00798
Filed: March 19, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Stark
Presiding Judge: James S. Gwin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 297 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/29/09. The Court adopts in whole Magistrate Judge Gallas's findings of fact and conclusions of law and incorporates them fully herein by reference. The Court grants in part the plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment and awards fees and costs in the amount of $191,255.75. (Related Doc. 279 , 293 ) (M,G)
September 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 293 Report and Recommendation that after review of plaintiff s motion to amend judgment for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1988 and for costs pursuant to Rule 54 (ECF # 279), and the City of Cantons objections. It is recommended that the motion be granted in part and denied in part to allow reasonable attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $191,255.75. Objections to R&R due by 10/9/2009. Magistrate Judge James S. Gallas on 9/25/2009. (W,G)
September 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 292 Order and Opinion signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/23/09 denying plaintiff's motion for new trial. (Related Doc. 275 ) (M,G)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 291 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/31/09 denying plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment to include prejudgment interest. (Related Doc. 276 ) (M,G)
July 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 290 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/24/09 denying defendants' motion to amend the judgment by reducing it to account for social security benefits payable to the decedent's children. (Related Doc. 277 ) (M,G)
May 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 271 Order and Opinion signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/8/09. For the reasons set forth in this entry this Court denies both parties' corresponding motions to exclude Dr. Spitz, Dr. Stark, Dr. Ancell, Dr. Thomson, Dr. DiMaio, and Dr. Neuman , denies defendants' motion to strike the plaintiff's attachments to his response regarding Dr. Spitz and Dr. Stark, defers judgment on the testimony of experts Murphy and Katsaris, with the motion to be renewed at trial, grants the motions prohibiting argument that the individual Defendant Officers were not prosecuted and that the jury should take social security benefits payable to the deceased's children into account and denies the motion to exclude the photographs and denies the motion for the use of the plaintiff's proposed jury questionnaire. (Related Docs. 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 216 ) (M,G)
May 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 244 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/8/09 granting plaintiff's motion to compel. (Related Doc. 237 ) (M,G)
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 215 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/7/09 denying plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. (Related Doc. 193 ) (M,G)
March 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 194 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/13/09 denying Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' Rule 68 Offer of Judgment (Doc # 174 ).(S,HR)
January 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 154 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/14/09 granting plaintiff's motion to lift stay. (Related Doc. 150 ) (M,G)
May 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 144 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/1/08. For the reasons stated in this Opinion and Order, the Court denies the Defendant Officers' motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's Section 1983 excessive force claim . The Court also denies Defendant City of Canton's summary judgment motion as to the plaintiff's Section 1983 failure to train claim. In all other respects, the Court grants the Canton Defendants' summary judgment motions. Accordingly, the Court also denies as moot the Defendant Officers' motion to stay expert discovery and trial pending the outcome of their summary judgment motion. (Related Docs. 83 , 84 , 137 ) (M,G). Modified text on 5/15/2008 (H, SP).
April 28, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 143 Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/28/08 granting the motion for summary judgment of Defendant Thomas Hopkins. (Related Doc. 74 ) (M,G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pirolozzi v. Stanbro et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Troy Pirolozzi
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Stanbro
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Guthrie
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Fuelling
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shawn Overdorf
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Hopkins
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Canton
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of Tobacco and Firearms
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Larry V. Slagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?