Stevenson v. Bobby
Petitioner: Scott Stevenson
Respondent: David Bobby
Case Number: 5:2007cv01343
Filed: May 8, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Trumbull
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Vernelis K. Armstrong
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation. Petition is dismissed. The Court certifies that this action could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/16/08. (B,CJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevenson v. Bobby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Scott Stevenson
Represented By: Thomas A. Sobecki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Bobby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?