James v. Hudson

James v. Hudson

Petitioner:	Wilson James
Respondent:	Stuart Hudson
Case Number:	5:2007cv02646
Filed:	August 31, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Stark
Presiding Judge:	George J. Limbert
Presiding Judge:	Donald C. Nugent
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2008	Filing 14 Memorandum Opinion and Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a) (3), that an appeal from this de cision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253 (c); Fed.R.App.P.22 (b). Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 9/30/2008. (Related doc 13 )(B,B) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/3/2009: # 1 page 2) (R,JM).
September 11, 2008	Filing 13 Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court find no merit to petitioner's sole ground for relief; further, it is recommended that the Court dismiss petitioner's petition with prejudice (Related document 1 ). Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 9/11/08. (S,AA) Modified on 11/23/2009 to create docket entry relationship (S,AA).

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2008

Filing 14 Memorandum Opinion and Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a) (3), that an appeal from this de cision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253 (c); Fed.R.App.P.22 (b). Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 9/30/2008. (Related doc 13 )(B,B) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/3/2009: # 1 page 2) (R,JM).

September 11, 2008

Filing 13 Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court find no merit to petitioner's sole ground for relief; further, it is recommended that the Court dismiss petitioner's petition with prejudice (Related document 1 ). Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 9/11/08. (S,AA) Modified on 11/23/2009 to create docket entry relationship (S,AA).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Hudson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Wilson James
Represented By:	Sarah M. Schregardus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Stuart Hudson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?