Rafferty v. Hudson

Rafferty v. Hudson

Petitioner:	Patrick Shane Rafferty
Respondent:	Stuart Hudson
Case Number:	5:2008cv01973
Filed:	August 14, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Summit
Presiding Judge:	George J. Limbert
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 14, 2009	Filing 17 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Rafferty's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 14 are overruled, the Report and Recommendation 11 is accepted, and Rafferty's petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is denied. Seeing no cause for an evidentiary hearing, the Court further denies Rafferty's motion for an evidentiary hearing 13 . As Rafferty has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, this Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2553(c), that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/14/2009. (P,J)
April 17, 2009	Filing 11 Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court dismiss petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus in its entirety with prejudice (Related document 1 ). Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 4/17/09. (S,AA)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 14, 2009

Filing 17 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Rafferty's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 14 are overruled, the Report and Recommendation 11 is accepted, and Rafferty's petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is denied. Seeing no cause for an evidentiary hearing, the Court further denies Rafferty's motion for an evidentiary hearing 13 . As Rafferty has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, this Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2553(c), that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/14/2009. (P,J)

April 17, 2009

Filing 11 Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court dismiss petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus in its entirety with prejudice (Related document 1 ). Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 4/17/09. (S,AA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rafferty v. Hudson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Patrick Shane Rafferty
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Stuart Hudson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?