Dover v. Eberlin

Dover v. Eberlin

Petitioner:	Courtney Dover
Respondent:	Michele Eberlin
Case Number:	5:2008cv02130
Filed:	September 4, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Stark
Presiding Judge:	Donald C. Nugent
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 2, 2009	Filing 13 Memorandum, Opinion and Order Adopting 12 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence is denied. Appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith (Related document(s) 1 ). Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 7/2/09 (B,IE). Modified text on 9/23/2009 (H,SP).
June 9, 2009	Filing 12 Report and Recommended Decision. The balance of petitioner's claims for relief having been procedurally defaulted, in light of all the foregoing it is concluded that no claim of constitutional violation has been presented requiring further proceedings prior to disposition on the merits and it is, therefore, recommended that the petition be dismissed without further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 6/9/09. (W,Jo)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 2, 2009

Filing 13 Memorandum, Opinion and Order Adopting 12 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence is denied. Appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith (Related document(s) 1 ). Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 7/2/09 (B,IE). Modified text on 9/23/2009 (H,SP).

June 9, 2009

Filing 12 Report and Recommended Decision. The balance of petitioner's claims for relief having been procedurally defaulted, in light of all the foregoing it is concluded that no claim of constitutional violation has been presented requiring further proceedings prior to disposition on the merits and it is, therefore, recommended that the petition be dismissed without further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman on 6/9/09. (W,Jo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dover v. Eberlin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Courtney Dover
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michele Eberlin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?