Prestige Equipment Corporation v. Case Machinery et al
Prestige Equipment Corporation |
Case Machinery Co., LLC, Jeffrey C Olson and L. Arthur Olson |
5:2008cv02164 |
September 9, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Contract: Other Office |
Summit |
David D. Dowd |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 69 and the referral is terminated. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 2/1/2001. (M,De) |
Filing 69 Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court rescind the referral in this matter, for the reasons set forth in this Report and Recommendation (Related document 62 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 1/11/10. (S,AA) |
Filing 60 Judgment Entry that for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order 59 filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, default judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff, Prestige Equipment Corporation, against defendant, L. A rthur Olson. The Court previously entered judgment against defendant Case Machinery Co., LLC. See ECF 42 . Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants L. Arthur Olson and Case Machinery Co., LLC, jointly and severally, in the amount of $118,000.00, not including costs and attorney fees. Copy of this entry mailed to all defendants on 7/23/2009. This case is closed. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 7/22/2009. (M,De) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.