Woodson v. Smith

Woodson v. Smith

Petitioner:	Rozell Woodson
Respondent:	Keith Smith
Case Number:	5:2008cv02779
Filed:	November 25, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Wayne
Presiding Judge:	Ann Aldrich
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2011	Filing 12 Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing petition w/prejudice. Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA)
September 23, 2010	Filing 11 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court denies in part, and grants in part, Respondent's 9 Motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion to Stay. Given that issues substantially overlapping those in Respondent's p etition for a writ of habeas corpus are pending in State court,the stay is granted on the condition that Petitioner seek reinstatement on the federal Court's active docket within thirty (30) days of fully exhausting his State court remedies. Ac cordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is stayed. And, Petitioner is granted leave to reinstate that petition on the Court's active docket within thirty (30) days of exhausting his state remedies. Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 09/23/2010. (M,TL) Modified text on 9/23/2010 (M,TL).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2011

Filing 12 Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing petition w/prejudice. Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA)

September 23, 2010

Filing 11 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court denies in part, and grants in part, Respondent's 9 Motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion to Stay. Given that issues substantially overlapping those in Respondent's p etition for a writ of habeas corpus are pending in State court,the stay is granted on the condition that Petitioner seek reinstatement on the federal Court's active docket within thirty (30) days of fully exhausting his State court remedies. Ac cordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is stayed. And, Petitioner is granted leave to reinstate that petition on the Court's active docket within thirty (30) days of exhausting his state remedies. Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 09/23/2010. (M,TL) Modified text on 9/23/2010 (M,TL).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodson v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rozell Woodson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Keith Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?