Freudeman v. Landing of Canton et al
| Dennis J. Freudeman |
| Landing of Canton, Emeritus Corporation and Wegman Companies, Inc. |
| 5:2009cv00175 |
| January 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office |
| Stark |
| David D. Dowd |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
330
Judgment Entry that for the reasons contained in the Memorandum Opinion 329 filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial is Denied. Plaintiff� 39;s motion for prejudgment interest and for a hearing is Denied. The Court awards attorney fees to the Plaintiff in the total sum of $494,037.50, and costs to the Plaintiff in the total sum of $60,136.67. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 12/30/2011. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
274
Order: Before the Court was plaintiff's oral motion to strike the testimony of Sue Rohr pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning defendants' duty to supplement discovery. The Court sustained the motion. An explanation of the Court's procedure and reasoning in sustaining the motion follows: (see Order for specifics). Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 9/2/2011. (S,He)
|
|
Filing
158
Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 146 ); Denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 145 ); and Denying as Moot, with permission to re-file as necessary, De fendants' Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Diane Tomer, LPN. This case shall proceed to trial as scheduled on all counts contained in Plaintiff's amended complaint. In a separate order, the Court will set a status conference during which it will discuss any remaining issues pertaining to the trial set for June 13, 2011. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 4/6/2011. (M,De)
|
|
Filing
124
Memorandum Opinion and Order that the Court concludes that defendants' have not met their burden of establishing that non-party MERs are physician-patient privileged documents. Consequently, they are subject to discovery with appropriate redaction of confidential information. Having determined that the Magistrate Judge's Order regarding production and redaction of non-party MERs is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, defendants' appeal of Magistrate Judge Pearson� 39;s Order regarding privilege and redaction is Dismissed and Denied. Defendants are ordered to comply with the Magistrate Judge's Order no later than 8/2/2010. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 7/19/2010. (M,De) Modified text on 7/19/2010 (M,De).
|
|
Filing
113
Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff's 77 Motion to compel discovery. Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/31/2010.(S,L) Modified text on 6/1/2010 (S,He).
|
|
Filing
66
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Defendants' Motion for a protective order. Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/5/2010.(S,L) Modified text on 1/6/2010 (S,He).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
