Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
Plaintiff: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Defendant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Travelers Casualty & Surety Company and Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Case Number: 5:2010cv00673
Filed: March 31, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
Presiding Judge: David D. Dowd
Presiding Judge: David D. Dowd
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 108 Memorandum Opinion that Goodyear Tire's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 77 ) is GRANTED in part with respect to Claims 1, 2 and 3 of plaintiff's second amended complaint. Because the Court ruled on Claims 1, 2 and 3 on the basis of the APA alone, plaintiff's alternative Claims 4, 5, 6 and 7 in the Second Amended Complaint are moot and Dismissed as such. The Court declines to exercise pendent state jurisdiction over Claim 8 of the second amended complaint, and Claim 8 is Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 78 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's FRCP 56(d)(1), (c)(1) & (e) Motion and Evidentiary Objections (ECF 82 ), and Defendant's Motion to Strike the Affidavit of David Sweet (ECF 99 ) are moot, and DENIED as such. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 8/15/2012. (M,De)
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 68 Memorandum Opinion Denying 62 Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 54(b) certification. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 5/5/2011. (M,De)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 Order that plaintiff Lockheed Martin's motion 33 to certify a question of Ohio insurance law to the Ohio Supreme Court is Denied and Travelers' motion to dismiss Counts 4-7 of the first amended complaint (ECF 15 ), upon reconsideration, is Granted. (Related document # 25 ). Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 2/11/2011.(M,De)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Represented By: Gregory J. DeGulis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travelers Casualty & Surety Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?