Kelley v. Smith

Kelley v. Smith

Petitioner:	William Kelley
Respondent:	Keith Smith
Case Number:	5:2010cv00731
Filed:	April 8, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Stark
Presiding Judge:	Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 17, 2013	Filing 66 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (re 58 ). Kelley's Rule 60(b) Motion (ECF No. 52) is denied, and final judgment is entered in favor of Respondent. The court grants Petitioner's Motion to Supplement Objections (ECF No. 63). The court further certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 9/17/2013. (D,M)
April 30, 2012	Filing 47 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (re 39 ). Petitioner's Motion to Compel State Court to Furnish Missing Portions of Court Record (ECF No. 42) is denied as moot. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 46) is denied. Kelley's Petition is dismissed because Grounds One through Seven are procedurally defaulted and final judgment is entered in favor of Respondent. Kelley's request for evidentiary hearing is denied. The court further certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 4/30/2012. (D,M)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 17, 2013

Filing 66 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (re 58 ). Kelley's Rule 60(b) Motion (ECF No. 52) is denied, and final judgment is entered in favor of Respondent. The court grants Petitioner's Motion to Supplement Objections (ECF No. 63). The court further certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 9/17/2013. (D,M)

April 30, 2012

Filing 47 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (re 39 ). Petitioner's Motion to Compel State Court to Furnish Missing Portions of Court Record (ECF No. 42) is denied as moot. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 46) is denied. Kelley's Petition is dismissed because Grounds One through Seven are procedurally defaulted and final judgment is entered in favor of Respondent. Kelley's request for evidentiary hearing is denied. The court further certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 4/30/2012. (D,M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelley v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William Kelley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Keith Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?