Hobbs v. Summit County Sheriff et al
Plaintiff: jillian hobbs
Defendant: Summit County Sheriff, Scott Plymire and Glenn Scott
Case Number: 5:2010cv02069
Filed: September 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Summit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 89 Memorandum Opinion and Order: This matter is before the Court on remand from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, with directions to consider plaintiff's third motion (Doc. No. 73 ) to extend the time for appeal from this Court's Fe bruary 2, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Judgment Entry dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and her related motion to alter or amend the order of November 26, 2012 denying that third motion (Doc. No. 75 ). The issue before th e Court on remand is whether to extend plaintiff's time for filing an appeal from orders issued on February 2, 2012 and September 25, 2012. Plaintiff's third motion to extend the time for appeal (Doc. No. 73 ) is granted. The second motion to alter/amend (Doc. No. 75 ) is denied as moot. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(C), plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this order to take appropriate action. Further, plaintiff's motion to vacate (Doc. No. 83 ) is denied without prejudice to renewal at an appropriate time. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/28/2014. (P,J)
February 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 Memorandum Opinion: For the reasons discussed within the Memorandum, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. No. 40 ) is GRANTED. Because there is lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the Court need not address any of Defendants' other arguments. Judge Sara Lioi on 02/01/12. Related documents 45 , 46 . (H,KR)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 Order denying Motions for leave to intervene (Related Doc # 13 and # 18 ), finding no basis for intervention under either Fed.R.Civ.P. 20 or 24. Judge Sara Lioi on 8/23/2011. (D,S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hobbs v. Summit County Sheriff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: jillian hobbs
Represented By: Andrew M. Holford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Summit County Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Plymire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenn Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?