Kendel v. Local 17-A United Food and Commercial Workers et al
Plaintiff: Tina Kendel
Defendant: Local 17-A United Food and Commercial Workers and John Does
Case Number: 5:2010cv02300
Filed: October 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Stark
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 196 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Defendant's 194 Motion for Reconsideration. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/3/2013. (S,L)
March 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 193 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff's 191 motion for an order compelling Defendant Local 17-A to provide the appellate court with the entire trial transcript. Defendant shall provide the entire trial transcript to the appellate court. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/25/2013. (S,L) Modified docket text on 3/25/2013 (BR,S).
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 150 Memorandum Opinion and Order Defendant Local 17-A's Objection to Plaintiff's Witness List (ECF No. 96 ) is sustained. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Racial Comments is granted (ECF No. 122 ). Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #1 (To Exclude Defendant's Dismissed Counterclaim Involving Social Security Numbers) (ECF No. 123 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #2 (To Exclude Any Court Orders, Verdicts and Opinions from Case No. 5:05cv1999 [NDOH]) (ECF No. 124 ) is granted. Defendant's Motion to Take Judicial Notice (ECF NO. 110 ) of an Order issued in Case No. 5:09cv1999 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #3 (To Exclude Invoking Attorney-Client Privilege to the issue of the Authorization of Retaliatory Counterclaim and Reason(s) for Said Claim) (ECF No. 125 ) is to be taken up outside of the hearing of the jury. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #4 (To Allow Her to Introduce Into Evidence Defendant's Policy with Hudson Insurance) (ECF No. 126 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #5 (To Exclude Plaintiff's Previous Trial Testimony) (ECF No. 127 ) is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/25/2012. (S,L)
December 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated above, the Court grants summary judgment in favor of Kendel on Defendants Counterclaim (ECF No. 75 ); denies as moot Kendel's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 56 ); and denies Local 17-A's motion for summary judgment in its entirety (ECF No. 59 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/5/2011. (S,L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kendel v. Local 17-A United Food and Commercial Workers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Kendel
Represented By: Edward L. Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Local 17-A United Food and Commercial Workers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?