Theiss v. Burger King Restaurant, et al
| Jean Theiss |
| Carrols Corporation, Burger King Restaurant and John/Jane Doe Employees 1-10 |
| 5:2011cv00787 |
| April 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Sara Lioi |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The motion (Doc. No. 11 ) of defendant Carrols Corporation to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted. Dismissal is, however, without prejudice. Further, to the extent plaintiff seeks leave to amend her complaint, that request is denied, also without prejudice to her right to bring another action in this or another court. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/20/2011. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
10
Order denying plaintiff's 5 Motion to remand without prejudice to renewal should plaintiff seek to amend by identifying the now fictitious defendants and thereby destroy diversity. Judge Sara Lioi on 6/7/2011. (P,G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
