Kyle v. Gansheimer

Kyle v. Gansheimer

Petitioner:	Sherman Kyle, III
Respondent:	Richard Gansheimer
Case Number:	5:2011cv01395
Filed:	July 8, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Summit
Presiding Judge:	Patricia A. Gaughan
Presiding Judge:	James R. Knepp
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2013	Filing 34 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is accepted. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed. Furthermore, for the reasons stated herein and in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, p ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealablity. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/4/13. (LC,S) re 33
September 29, 2011	Filing 10 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Petitioner's Motion for Discovery and Inspection (Related Doc # 5 ). Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 9/29/2011.(B,IE)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2013

Filing 34 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is accepted. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed. Furthermore, for the reasons stated herein and in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, p ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealablity. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/4/13. (LC,S) re 33

September 29, 2011

Filing 10 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Petitioner's Motion for Discovery and Inspection (Related Doc # 5 ). Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 9/29/2011.(B,IE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kyle v. Gansheimer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Sherman Kyle, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Gansheimer
Represented By:	William H. Lamb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?