Sanford v. Stewart et al
| Clarence Sanford |
| Lisa Stewart, Suzanne Moore, Adrienne Welfle, Cheryl Richards, Sandra Flood and Denise James |
| 5:2011cv02360 |
| November 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Stark |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies, in its entirety, Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration and Supplement to the motion. ECF Nos. 84 ; 85 . The Court grants in part and denies in part D efendants' Motion to Stay and Continue Pre-Trial Dates. ECF No. 87 . The Court will hold an in-person final pre-trial on 4/14/2014 at 10:30 a.m. The Court will set a new trial date at the final pre-trial conference. The Court will also schedule new dates for the filing of pretrial submissions. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/2/2014. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
82
Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated in this Order, the Court denies Defendants' 68 Motion for summary judgment and the qualified immunity defense as it pertains to Defendants Stewart, Welfe, Richards, Moore and Flood. The Court grants the motion for summary judgment and qualified immunity as to Defendant James. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/31/2013. (M,TL)
|
|
Filing
73
Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Expert Report and Testimony (ECF No. 70 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/12/2013. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
64
Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons stated herein, the Court orders Plaintiff to pay Dr. Volk an expert witness fee of $200 per hour for the 2.25 hours spent in the deposition setting. Additionally, the Court denies Defendants&# 039; unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion. ECF No. 63 .4 The Court has already advised counsel that the parties should not expect any further enlargement of dates. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/22/2013. Related document(s) 61 , 62 , 63 . (JLG)
|
|
Filing
36
Memorandum and Order. The Motion to Compel 30 is granted in part, and denied in part. As to the first request for documents, it is hereby ordered that the incident report responsive to the first request for documents ("eye injury" ; incident) shall be produced in its entirety to Sanford, subject to the protections of the Stipulated Protective Order for the Protection of Confidential Information 18 . The motion is denied as to the second request for production of documents. Referral Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 10/24/12. (R,N) Modified text on 10/24/2012 (R,N).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
