Shively et al v. Green Local School District Board of Education et al
| Lisa Shively and James Shively |
| Green Local School District Board of Education, Michael Nutter, Wade Lucas, Cindy Brown, Mark Booth, Jeff Miller, Jeff Wells and John Doe 1-10 |
| 5:2011cv02398 |
| November 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
Memorandum Opinion and Order Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Dismissal for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (ECF No. 18 ) is granted in part. All constitutional claims averring indirect injury to Plaintiff Pa rents, as well as Plaintiff Parents' claims under Title IX, are dismissed. In addition, Counts III and IV, the prong of Count V alleging student-on-student harassment based upon religion, and the prong of Count VI alleging a Monell claim for vi olation of the First Amendment, are dismissed. The Court also dismisses the claims against Defendants Michael Nutter, Wade Lucas, Cindy Brown, Mark Booth, Jeff Miller, and Jeff Wells in their official capacities. Finally, Plaintiffs allegations against John Does 1-10 are dismissed without prejudice. All other claims remain pending. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/28/2013. (S,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
