Stiso v. International Steel Group, et al
| Michael Stiso |
| International Steel Group, Arcelormittal USA LLC, International Steel Group Inc. Long Term Disability Insurance Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
| 5:2011cv02592 |
| November 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| John R. Adams |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting Defendants' Motion for judgment on the pleadings (Related Doc # 58 ). Based upon the within analysis, Stiso cannot succeed on his claims against any of the Defendants. Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants on each of Stiso's ERISA and ERISA-related claims. Judge John R. Adams on 3/29/13.(R,Sh)
|
|
Filing
50
Order denying Plaintiff's Motion seeking discovery (Related Doc # 33 ); granting 33 Plaintiff's motion to reset the briefing schedule; denying Plaintiff's Motion for leave to amend (Related Doc # 36 ); denying Defendant Met Life's Motion to dismiss without prejudice (Related Doc # 9 ); denying Defendant Arcelormittal's Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim without prejudice (Related Doc # 18 ). Plaintiff's Wilkins brief due within 14 days of this order. Response due 21 days thereafter. Reply due 7 days thereafter. Judge John R. Adams on 7/25/12.(L,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
