Amarado Oil Company, LTD. v. Davis et al
Plaintiff: Amarado Oil Company, LTD.
Defendant: Dean Davis, Roger Proper, Daniel H. Plumly and Critchfield, Critchfield and Johnston, Ltd.
Case Number: 5:2012cv00627
Filed: March 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 113 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants Davis' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 47 ) in part and denies it in part.The case will proceed against Davis on Count 1(A) and Count 2 as it relates to Count 1(A), in addition to Count 10, breach of warranty. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/17/2013. (JLG)
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 104 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated herein, the Court is satisfied that an informed consent and waiver of conflict has indeed been executed, and that the matter is in hand. The Court is satisfied that an informed consent and waiver of conflict has indeed been executed, and that the matter is in hand. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/30/2013. Related document(s) 93 . (JLG)
August 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 83 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 77 ). The Court also denies the portion of the Davis Defendants' Motion to Dismiss requesting the Court strike the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 47 at 1). The case will proceed pursuant to the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 46 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/7/2013. Related document(s) 46 , 47 , 77 .(JLG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amarado Oil Company, LTD. v. Davis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amarado Oil Company, LTD.
Represented By: Craig S. Horbus
Represented By: Alex J. Ragon
Represented By: Frank J. Witschey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Proper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel H. Plumly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Critchfield, Critchfield and Johnston, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?