Coniglio et al v. C B C Services, Inc. et al
Frank Coniglio, Jr. and Joseph Coniglio |
C B C Services, Inc. and Brandon Williams |
5:2012cv01773 |
July 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Akron Office |
Carroll |
John R. Adams |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 Order denying as moot Plaintiffs' Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Related Doc # 35 ); granting Defendants' Motion for attorney fees and costs(Related Doc # 42 ); granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs 9; Motion for partial summary judgment (Related Doc # 71 ); granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (Related Doc # 73 ); granting Defendants' Motion to strike (Related Doc # 77 ); granting Plaintiffs& #039; Motion for leave to supplement their opposition to the motion for fees and costs (Related Doc # 80 ); granting Plaintiffs' Motion to supplement their partial motion for summary judgment(Related Doc # 91 ); granting Defendants' Motion for leave to file a sur-reply(Related Doc # 95 ). See order for further details. Judge John R. Adams on 7/16/13.(L,J) |
Filing 21 Order granting Movant's Motion to intervene as a party. Chesapeake Exploration, LLC and CHK Utica, LLC are added and intervenor Defendants. (Related Doc # 6 ) Judge John R. Adams on 7/20/12.(K,C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.