State et al v. Arlington Bank et al
| State and M. A. Berman |
| Jump Legal Group, W. M. Jump, Does, Arlington Bank, Matt Hohl, Jack D'Aurora, John J. MacKinnon, Behal Law Offices LLC and John Sherrod |
| 5:2012cv02888 |
| November 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Portage |
| Sara Lioi |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
Order: Plaintiff's "Motion for Mandatory Judicial Notice, Notice of Void Judgment and Orders, Demand for Relief under Rule 60(B)(3)(4) and 60(D)(3), Disqualification of Judge and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law" filed on July 15, 2013 (Doc. No. 31 ) is denied. Further, plaintiff Mark A. Berman, aka M.A. Berman, is permanently enjoined from filing any additional documents in this case and is permanently enjoined from filing any new lawsuits or other documents in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, without seeking and obtaining leave of court in accordance with this Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/2/2013. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
29
Memorandum Opinion and Order: This action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/22/2013. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
