Sturtz Machinery, Inc. v. Dove's Industries, Inc. et al
Sturtz Machinery, Inc. |
Dove's Industries, Inc. and M&T Bank |
5:2013cv00404 |
February 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Akron Office |
Summit |
Sara Lioi |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 22 ) is granted. Since the case has previously been stayed as to defendant Dove, the Court will defer issuing any judgment entry relating to the ins tant ruling at this time. Instead, the Court will conduct a telephonic status conference with all counsel (including counsel for Dove) on Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 3:30 p.m., to discuss the further disposition of the case and the propriety of filing a judgment entry. Directions for accessing the Court's bridge line will be emailed to counsel by the courtroom deputy. Judge Sara Lioi on 4/8/2014. (P,J) |
Filing 23 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and to stay all further proceedings in this action pending completion of the arbitration is granted. (Doc. No. 5 .) The case as it relates to Dove's Industries, Inc. is stayed until further order of the Court. The case as it relates to M&T Bank shall proceed. The parties are directed to advise the Court immediately upon completion of the arbitration. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/1/2013. (P,J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.