Gilcreast v. Bunting
Petitioner: Cleottis Gilcreast
Respondent: Jason Bunting
Case Number: 5:2013cv01357
Filed: June 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Summit
Presiding Judge: Kathleen B. Burke
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Order denying 40 Petitioner's Motion for relief from judgment. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 7/29/2015.(S,SR)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 Opinion and Order overruling Gilcreast's objections 37 adopting the Magistrate Judge's R&R 35 , and denying the 2254 Petition 1 . Judge Dan A. Polster(C,KA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilcreast v. Bunting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cleottis Gilcreast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bunting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?