Bash v. Laikin
Plaintiff: Brian A. Bash
Defendant: Daniel S. Laikin
Case Number: 5:2013cv02371
Filed: October 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Summit
Presiding Judge: Patricia A Gaughan
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2014 Filing 8 Memorandum Opinion and Order. The R&R is ACCEPTED in PART and REJECTED in PART. In addition, for the foregoing reasons, the Court does not accept the sanctions award. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan(C,KA)
December 23, 2013 Filing 7 SEALED Document: Response to the Objections to the Report and Recommendation, filed by Brian A. Bash (Related document(s) #3 , #6 ). (H,SP)
December 23, 2013 Filing 6 Response to the Objections of Defendant Daniel S. Laikin to Report and Recommendation After Trial (Redacted Version. Original Filed Under Seal) filed by Brian A. Bash. Related document(s) #3 . (Douthett, Breaden)
December 6, 2013 Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Michael J. Montgomery filed by on behalf of Brian A. Bash. (Montgomery, Michael)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Objections to the Report and Recommendation After Trial is Granted to 12/23/13. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/26/13. (LC,S) re #4
November 22, 2013 Filing 4 Motion for extension of time filed by Plaintiff Brian A. Bash. Related document(s) #3 . (Douthett, Breaden)
November 21, 2013 Filing 3 Objection to Report and Recommendation After Trial filed by Daniel S. Laikin. Related document(s) #1 . (Welker, Lori)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Motion of Defendant Daniel S. Laikin for Enlargement of Time to File Objections to Report and Recommendation After Trial is Granted to 11/21/13. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/1/13. (LC,S) re #2 .
October 29, 2013 Filing 2 Motion for extension of time until November 21, 2013 to File Objections to Report and Recommendation After Trial filed by Defendant Daniel S. Laikin. Related document(s) #1 . (Welker, Lori)
October 25, 2013 Filing 1 Report and Recommendation After Trial (with Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law). Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum on 10/24/2013. (Attachments: #1 USBC Docket Sheet, Adversary Proceedings Case 10-5043, #2 Cover Letter) (S,He)
October 25, 2013 Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (S,He)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bash v. Laikin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel S. Laikin
Represented By: Michael L. Cioffi
Represented By: Stuart A. Laven, Jr.
Represented By: Lori H. Welker
Represented By: Scott B. Lepene
Represented By: Mark A. Phillips
Represented By: Nathaniel R. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian A. Bash
Represented By: Breaden M. Douthett
Represented By: Kelly S. Burgan
Represented By: Alexis C. Beachdell
Represented By: Michael J. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?