Engle v. City of Cuyahoga Falls et al
| Kathryn E. Engle |
| City of Cuyahoga Falls, Charles H. Nettles, City Development, Cuyahoga Falls Police Department, Daniel Randall, McGowan, Officer 6384, Robert Schmidt, Holzapfel, Richard Garinger, Officer 2993, Ralston, Heinl, St. Thomas Hospital and Daniel Celik |
| 5:2014cv01161 |
| May 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Sara Lioi |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
Memorandum Opinion. Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 128 ) is granted in part. Specifically, plaintiff's conspiracy claim, her due process claim, and her Fourth Amendment claim, to the extent it seeks redress for the Apr il 17, 2013 entry into her home, are dismissed. Additionally, defendants Schmidt, McIlvain, Ralston, Luggelle, Holzapfel, Heinl, and Nettle are dismissed as party defendants. Plaintiff's summary judgment motion (Doc. No. 134 ) is denied in full . Assuming the remaining parties are unable to reach an amicable resolution of this matter, this case shall proceed to trial on the surviving portions of plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim, her claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and her trespass claim. Where applicable, defendants will be able to request qualified and/or statutory immunity for these claims at trial. Judge Sara Lioi on 8/1/16. (S,HR)
|
|
Filing
17
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Summa defendants, the city, the CFPD, and the CFDD are dismissed from this action. For the same reasons, plaintiff's Monell claim is also dismissed. Additionally, plaintiff's claims for excessive force, state civil conspiracy, and negligent infliction of emotional distress are dismissed against the remaining defendants. This case shall go forward on the Fourth Amendment search and seizure claim against the city officers, the Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against the city officers, the federal conspiracy claim against the city officers and defendant Nettle, and the state law claims of trespass and intentional infliction of emotional distress against the city officers. (Related Doc # 12 , 14 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 6/22/2015. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
