Barnhart v. Carroll County, Ohio et al
| Devan J. Barnhart |
| Carroll County, Ohio, Dale Williams, Carroll County Sheriff's Office, Robert T. Watson, Ron Roe, Scott Soe, Minerva Police Department, Officer John Doe, Multi-County Law Enforcement Against Drugs Task Force and ABC Law Enforcement Agency |
| 4:2014cv01533 |
| July 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Carroll |
| John R. Adams |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 50 ) and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendant Watson and Defendant Carroll County. See Order for details. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 11/23/2015. (D,I)
|
|
Filing
49
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 29 Defendants' Motion for partial summary judgment and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Dale Williams, Ron Roe and Scott Soe. Count I and Count III remain pen ding with respect to the claims asserted against Defendant Lt. Robert T. Watson and Count II remains pending with respect to the claims asserted against Defendant Carroll County. See Order for details. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 7/28/2015. (D,I)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
