Ross v. Rockwell Automation et al
Felicia Ross |
Rockwell Automation, Daniel Bates, Steve Humes, Shealy Norman, Denise, Mark Boggs, Marty and Nehal Burgess |
5:2014cv01886 |
August 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Akron Office |
Summit |
Sara Lioi |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Memorandum Opinion: Plaintiff's complaint does not satisfy even the liberal pleading standards afforded pro se litigants. She has not stated any claim for which she is entitled to relief. As a result, defendant Rockwell Automation is entitled to dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Related Doc # 8 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 6/30/2015. (P,J) |
Filing 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants Daniel Bates, Steve Humes, Norman Shealy, "Denise", Mark Boggs, "Marty", and Nehal Burgess are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e), and the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from their dismissal could not be taken in good faith. The Clerk's Office is directed to forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshal for service of process on Rockwell Automation. A copy of this order shall be included with the documents to be served. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/16/2014. (P,J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.