CODA Development s.r.o. et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
| CODA Development s.r.o., CODA Innovations s.r.o. and Frantisek Hrabal |
| Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Robert Benedict and Robert Allen Losey |
| 5:2015cv01572 |
| August 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Sara Lioi |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
394
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order finding in favor of defendants Robert Benedict and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company on plaintiffs' claim for correction of inventorship as to the '586 Patent (Count One); further dismissi ng plaintiffs' claim for joint inventorship as to the '254 Patent (Count Two) as having been abandoned by plaintiffs; and dismissing any request for declaratory relief (Count Five) and/or injunctive relief. Attorneys are cautioned not to rely on the docket entry only. Read the attached order for details. Judge Sara Lioi on 3/31/2023. (V,A)
|
|
Filing
262
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth, 221 , 229 defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' remaining claims is denied; further, 222 , 225 defendants' motion for summary judgment as to trade secrets damages is also denied. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/30/2021. (E,CK)
|
|
Filing
219
Memorandum Opinion and Order re 168 and 169 , 195 and 196 Objections filed by defendants in so far as they relate to defendants' discovery requests in Doc. 103 and 110 , as supplemented by Doc. 144 , are overruled in part and sustained in part; in particular, all objections are overruled except as to the Alliacense Chart II (for which privilege was waived) and the Jackson Excel Notes and FH Claim Chart (for which production is warranted under the "substantial need" doctrine). Counsel and parties are cautioned to read the entire order and not rely only on this docket text. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/4/2021. (D,S)
|
|
Filing
82
Memorandum Opinion and Order that the Court will require that plaintiffs supply a "closed" response to defendants' Interrogatory No. 1, supplying sufficient specificity and description to permit defendants to know what discovery will be relevant and what specific claims of trade secret misappropriation they must defend against. Although general supplementation will not be permitted, should it be determined that plaintiffs inadvertently failed to include something in their a nswer to Interrogatory No. 1, the Court will remain open to entertaining limited supplementation upon a showing of an exceptional reason for doing so. The parties are advised to read the full Memorandum Opinion and Order for the Court's entire ruling and not merely rely upon this docket text. Judge Sara Lioi on 11/21/2019. (D,S)
|
|
Filing
42
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth herein and in defendants' opposition (Doc. No. 36 ), plaintiffs' motion to amend, or for relief from, the Court's judgment dismissing the case (Doc. No. 32 ) is denied, e xcept for the single correction in note 5, supra, regarding substitution of inventors under 35 U.S.C. Section 256. Further, plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a first amended complaint (Doc. No. 33 ) is denied. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/26/2017. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
30
Memorandum Opinion: For the reasons set forth herein, as well as those set forth in defendants' supporting memoranda, plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. No. 26 ) is denied, and defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 16 ) is granted. This case is dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/29/2016. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
