Weideman v. Doak et al
| Joseph Weideman |
| Dave Doak, Dr. Vargo, Carol Milder, K. Edwards, M. Shaw, M. Lynn, Mr. Couch, Amy Pederson, Kelly Haggard, Sheena Manley, Brooke Featheringham and Carlos Perez |
| 5:2015cv01881 |
| September 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Portage |
| Sara Lioi |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
Memorandum Opinion: The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Limbert's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 64 ) and adopts the same. Accordingly, defendant Carol Miller's motion is: (1) granted insofar as it requests dismissal of all federal claims with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and dismissal of the pendant state law claims without prejudice; (2) denied as moot insofar as it requests dismissal of all claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (5); (3) d enied moot insofar as it requests dismissal of all claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); and (4) denied as moot insofar as it requests that summary judgment be granted in favor of defendant on all claims pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 2117.06. (Doc. No. 55 .) All claims against all other defendants having been previously dismissed (Doc. No. 63 ), this case is dismissed in its entirety and closed. A judgment entry will be separately published. Judge Sara Lioi on 4/12/2017. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
63
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The objections to the Interim Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 54 ) are overruled. The well-reasoned and thorough R&R is adopted in its entirety, and the motions to dismiss with prejudice are granted. (Doc. Nos. 19 , 30 , 34 ). This case shall now proceed solely against defendant Dr. Carol Miller, who has a pending motion to dismiss that is not addressed by the R&R. (Doc. No. 55 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 3/10/2017. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
9
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant Judge Laura Pittman is dismissed from this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision dismissing Judge Laura Pittman could not be taken in good faith. The Clerk's Office is directed to forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshal for service of process on the remaining defendants. (Related Doc # 1 , 6 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 2/8/2016. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
