Hopson v. Miller

Hopson v. Miller

Petitioner:	Peyton Hopson
Respondent:	Michelle Miller
Case Number:	5:2016cv01867
Filed:	July 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Stark
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Presiding Judge:	James R. Knepp
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 8, 2019	Filing 29 Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth herein, Hopson's motion for leave to amend his petition (Doc. No. 26 ) is DENIED, Hopson's objections to the Report & Recommendation (Doc. No. 24 ) are OVERRULED and the Rep ort & Recommendation (Doc. No. 21 ) is ACCEPTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1 ) is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Sara Lioi on 07/08/2019. (M,TL)
December 30, 2016	Filing 10 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court concludes that recusal from the instant action is not required in this case, and plaintiff's motion is denied. (Doc. No. 4 .) This case shall proceed with the assigned judicial officer. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/30/2016. (P,J)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 8, 2019

Filing 29 Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth herein, Hopson's motion for leave to amend his petition (Doc. No. 26 ) is DENIED, Hopson's objections to the Report & Recommendation (Doc. No. 24 ) are OVERRULED and the Rep ort & Recommendation (Doc. No. 21 ) is ACCEPTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1 ) is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Sara Lioi on 07/08/2019. (M,TL)

December 30, 2016

Filing 10 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court concludes that recusal from the instant action is not required in this case, and plaintiff's motion is denied. (Doc. No. 4 .) This case shall proceed with the assigned judicial officer. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/30/2016. (P,J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hopson v. Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Peyton Hopson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michelle Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?