United States of America v. $145,400.00 in U.S. Currency Seized on March 28, 2016, Pursuant to the Execution of a Federal Search Warrant
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $145,400.00 in U.S. Currency Seized on March 28, 2016, Pursuant to the Execution of a Federal Search Warrant
Case Number: 5:2016cv01952
Filed: August 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Summit
Presiding Judge: Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $145,400.00 in U.S. Currency Seized on March 28, 2016, Pursuant to the Execution of a Federal Search Warrant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: James L. Morford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $145,400.00 in U.S. Currency Seized on March 28, 2016, Pursuant to the Execution of a Federal Search Warrant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?