Wright v. General Motors Company et al
||Franklin H. Wright
||General Motors Company and Doug Bigelow Chevrolet, Inc.
||September 16, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||Benita Y. Pearson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 31, 2017
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, this action is dismissed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B). The Court denies as moot Plaintiff's pending motions to serve the summons and complaint (ECF No. 3 ), to reassign the case to Judge Polster (ECF No. 4 ), for permission for electronic case filing (ECF No. 9 ), and to request counsel invitation and judicial notice of relevant filings (ECF No. 10 ). Plaintiff's motion to supplement his Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d) (ECF No. 11 ) is denied because it does not cure the deficiencies in his original complaint and is futile. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2 and 8 ) is granted. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/31/2017. (E,CK)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?