Darby v. Kagler, et al
| Mary Louise Darby |
| Robert Kagler, Alfred Schrader, Thomas O. Schmidt, Gregory Glover, Arthur L. Sigler, Thom Cuddy, Kevin McCulley, Alan Brubaker, John Labriola, Connie Krauss, Mary Margaret Rowlands, Deborah Matz and John Donofrio |
| 5:2016cv02426 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Sara Lioi |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
Memorandum Opinion: For all of the reasons set forth in the Court's September 18, 2017 Memorandum Opinion, reproduced above, Darby's motion to amend (Doc. No. 7 ) and motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 9 ) are denied. Her motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 8 ) is denied as moot. Because it was improvidently submitted, the Court also instructs the Clerk to return to Darby her proposed notarized complaint. Further, Darby is cautioned that if she continues to file r epetitive, baseless motions and materials, the Court will consider taking action to restrict her court access by requiring her to obtain leave of court before submitting any additional filings. See Filipas v. Lemons, 835 F.2d 1145, 1146 (6th Cir. 1987). The Court would prefer not to take this extraordinary measure but will do so, if it must, to prevent the abuse of the judicial process. Judge Sara Lioi on 5/8/2018. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
6
Memorandum Opinion: The motion of pro se plaintiff Mary Louise Darby styled "Motion to Refile[,] Motion to Amend Complaint[,] Writ of Certiorari on Court[,] Memorandum Opinion[,]" which the Court interprets as a motion to amend (Doc. No. 5 ) is denied. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/18/2017. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
3
Memorandum Opinion: The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is granted, and for the reasons stated above, her action is summarily dismissed pursuant 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. (Related Doc. No. 1 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 7/5/2017. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
