Roth v. City of Canton et al
Michael T. Roth |
City of Canton, Ohio, City of Canton Police Department, Shirley Moore, Richard Kinlow, Joshua H. Coates, Lester Marino, Judi Solly and John Does |
5:2017cv00234 |
February 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Akron Office |
Stark |
Benita Y. Pearson |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (ECF No. 120 ) is granted. Defendants' Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 121 ) is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/17/2020. (JLG) |
Filing 91 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 59 ) is denied without prejudice and may be resubmitted if the Court of Appeals does not remand for this Court to gr ant Defendants' Motion for Relief From Judgment. Defendants' Motion for an Indicative Ruling (ECF No. 79 ) is granted. The Court indicates and hereby certifies under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1 that upon remand from the Sixth Circuit it would: grant Defendants' Motion for Relief From Judgment and issue an order vacating the Court's 9/28/2018 Memorandum of Opinion and Order (ECF No. 75 ). Defendants shall promptly notify the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Si xth Circuit pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 12.1(a) of the Court's within indicative ruling. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(b). Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion for an Indicative Ruling and Motion for Relief Fro m Judgment (ECF No. 85 ) is denied. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplement (ECF No. 89 ) is granted. Plaintiffs' Supplement to Their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Vacate (ECF No. 88 ) is stricken from the file pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/26/2019. (JLG) |
Filing 75 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction (ECF No. 40 ) is granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, Defendants City of Canton and Shirley Moore, and all those in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this injunctive order, are enjoined from enforcing Canton Ordinance 505.14, which states: (a) Except as provided in Section 505.15, a person may not possess, keep, harbo r, or permit to be possessed, kept, or harbored in or about any dwelling unit or structure under their control a total of more than five dogs or cats, in any combination, over four months of age. "Harbor" means to give shelter or refuge to. "Dwelling unit" and "structure" are defined in Chapter 1123. (b) Any person who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/28/2018. (JLG) |
Filing 8 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for disqualification (Doc. No. 7 ) is denied as to the reasons advanced by the plaintiff. However, the Court recuses itself for a completely independent reason pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 455, because one of the defendants is a close personal friend of the Court's niece. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/8/2017. (P,J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.