Heru v. State of Ohio Inc. et al
| Sakhu Maa Tem Heru |
| State of Ohio Inc., Tuscarawas County Common Pleas Court, Tuscarawas County Commissioners, Tuscarawas County Prosecutor's Office and Elizabeth L. Thomakos |
| 5:2017cv00247 |
| February 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Tuscarawas |
| Sara Lioi |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's claims against the State of Ohio, the Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas, the Tuscarawas County Commissioners, the Tuscarawas County Prosecutor's Office, Judge Elizabeth L. Thomakos, Ass istant Prosecutor David Hipp, Prosecutor Ryan Styer, Detective Scott Ballentine, ODRC Religious Services Administrator Michael Davis, ODRC Chief Inspector, Clerk of Court Jeanne Stephens, and Public Defender Matthew Petit are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff's Freedom of Religion claims against Belmont Correctional Institution warden, Mary Potter, and Belmont Correctional Institution chaplain, Berger, are transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. (Related Doc. No. 1 , 4 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 6/2/2017. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
