Swysgood v. Board of Education of the Northwestern Local School District of West Salem et al
| Scott Swysgood |
| Board of Education of the Northwestern Local School District of West Salem and Jeffrey N. Layton |
| 5:2017cv00697 |
| April 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Wayne |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant's Motion for Costs is granted in part. The Court denies Defendant's request for costs arising from the deposition transcript of Keener, in the amount of $200.00. The Court grants the remainder of Defendant's requests. Plaintiff is ordered to pay Defendant $6,779.51 in costs. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/8/2019. (Related Document(s) 115 ) (S,Ke)
|
|
Filing
59
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff Scott Swysgood's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 43 ) is denied, and Defendants Board of Education of the Northwestern Local School District of West Salem and Superintendent Jeffrey Layton's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47 ) is granted in all parts, except as to Plaintiff's breach of contract claim. Going forward, the only claim in dispute is Plaintiff's breach of contract claim. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/20/2018. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
