Messenheimer v. Coastal Pet Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carol Messenheimer
Defendant: Coastal Pet Products, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2017cv00738
Filed: April 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Stark
Presiding Judge: Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS Defendant Coastal Pet Products, Inc.'s 26 Motion for summary judgment in full. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 7/27/2018. (P,G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Messenheimer v. Coastal Pet Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Messenheimer
Represented By: Robert A. Pecchio
Represented By: Andrew J. Wides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coastal Pet Products, Inc.
Represented By: Darrell N. Markijohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?