Dougall et al v. Copley-Fairlawn City School District Board of Education et al
| Paul Dougall and Jennifer Dougall |
| Copley-Fairlawn City School District Board of Education, Brian E. Poe, Kenneth Calderone, Jessica Vargo, Paul Cevasco, Sue Emich, Richard Levin and Ohio Department of Education |
| 5:2017cv01664 |
| August 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Sara Lioi |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
Memorandum Opinion and Order For reasons set forth in this order, Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 49) is DENIED. The CFCSD Defendants' request that this Court dismiss Counts II a nd II of the Complaint (Doc. No. 55-1 at p. 27) is GRANTED. Counts II and III of the Complaint are hereby DISMISSED. Defendants' request that this Court issue a show cause order why the Dougalls attorney should not be liable to Copley-Fa irlawn for attorneys fees in this action pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 1415(i)(3)(B) is DENIED. The CFCSD Defendants have not shown that the instant action is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, or presented for an improper purpose such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/28/2020. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
42
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs' motion to supplement the administrative record (Doc. No. 36 /36-1) is denied with the following caveat. Following this Court's review of the administrative proceedings encompassed by Count s I, II, and III of the complaint, should any party desire to supplement the record with any additional documents relevant to the merits of the claims in Counts VVIII, the Court will entertain (although it is not inviting) an appropriate, timely moti on setting forth good cause for limited supplementation. Pursuant to the Court's Order dated August 15, 2018, plaintiffs' opening brief with respect to Counts I, II, and III is now due by April 2, 2019; defendants' response brief will be due May 28, 2019; plaintiffs' reply will be due June 25, 2019. Judge Sara Lioi on 3/18/2019. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
