Bounty Minerals, LLC v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. et al
Bounty Minerals, LLC |
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Energy Marketing, L.L.C. |
5:2017cv01695 |
August 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Akron Office |
Carroll |
Sara Lioi |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 Memorandum Opinion and Order. For all the reasons set forth in this order,the Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 94 ) is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 81 ) is GRANTED. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 12/23/2019. (W,RA) |
Filing 70 Memorandum Opinion denying plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint and remand. (Related Doc. No. 54 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 2/26/2019. (P,J) |
Filing 35 Memorandum Opinion: Plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint (Doc. No. 32 ) is granted, and defendants' motion to partially dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. No. 31 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file its proposed second amended complaint, a copy of which is attached to its motion as Doc. No. 32-1, within 7 days of this memorandum opinion. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/14/2018. (P,J) |
Filing 22 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint (Doc. No. 16 ) is granted, and defendants' amended motion to compel arbitration and to stay the proceedings (Doc. No. 8 ) is denied. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/1/2017. (P,J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.