Monarch Steel Company, Inc. v. McCracken et al
Plaintiff: Monarch Steel Company, Inc.
Defendant: James Edward McCracken, JIMMYMACSTEEL LLC and Liberty Steel Products, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2017cv02253
Filed: October 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Stark
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 132 Order: The Court ADOPTS the recommendation of the Special Master for the parties to file the forthcoming motions and related briefs under seal provisionally (ECF No. 131 ). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file the briefs and related motions under seal pursuant to Rule 5.2(a) and this Order. Each shall remain sealed for 10 days after filed unless the Court extends this deadline. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on May 1, 2024. (Y,A)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 120 Order: The Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objection to and Motion to Modify Portions of the Special Master's December 28 2023 Report and Recommendation and ADOPTS the recommendations of the Special Master. Defendants are not precluded from introducing a new liability expert. The Court will set a schedule by separate order. (Related documents 114 , 116 ) Judge J. Philip Calabrese on January 10, 2024. (Y,A)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 95 Order For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion of counsel from Gallagher Sharp to withdraw as counsel for Liberty Steel and Jon Campbell. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 12/22/2022. (S,KM)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 94 Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs' motion for contempt (ECF No. 23 ) and disposes of Liberty Steel's objections and motion to modify (ECF No. 68 ) the Special Master's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 62 ; ECF No. 75 ) and Plaintiffs' motion to adopt and clarify (ECF No. 69 & ECF No. 79 ) as stated in its Opinion and Order. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 12/15/2022. (Y,A).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monarch Steel Company, Inc. v. McCracken et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monarch Steel Company, Inc.
Represented By: Sean S. Kelly
Represented By: Ami J. Patel
Represented By: Stephen S. Zashin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Edward McCracken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JIMMYMACSTEEL LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Steel Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?