Palmer v. Marquis

Palmer v. Marquis

Petitioner:	Andrew G. Palmer
Respondent:	Dave Marquis
Case Number:	5:2018cv01111
Filed:	May 14, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Summit
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Presiding Judge:	David A. Ruiz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 13, 2021	Filing 31 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Pro Se Petitioner Andrew G. Palmer's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 30 ) are overruled and the Report and Recommendat ion (ECF No. 28 ) is adopted. Andrew G. Palmer's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) is dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/13/2021. (JLG)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 13, 2021

Filing 31 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Pro Se Petitioner Andrew G. Palmer's Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 30 ) are overruled and the Report and Recommendat ion (ECF No. 28 ) is adopted. Andrew G. Palmer's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) is dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/13/2021. (JLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palmer v. Marquis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew G. Palmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dave Marquis
Represented By:	Mary Anne Reese
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?