Benedict v. W. W. Grainger, Inc.
| Amanda Benedict |
| W. W. Grainger, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv01438 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Sara Lioi |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting #8 defendant's second unopposed motion for extension of time until 9/18/2018 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint. Judge Sara Lioi on 8/21/2018.(P,J)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until September 18, 2018 to answer filed by Defendant W. W. Grainger, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Gerak, John) |
|
Order [non-document] granting #5 defendant's motion for extension of time until 8/21/2018 to respond to the complaint. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/24/2018.(P,J)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Correction and Supplementation of Filings filed by W. W. Grainger, Inc.. (Gerak, John) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by W. W. Grainger, Inc.. (Gerak, John) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Plead (Extension of Time until August 21, 2018 to Answer) filed by Defendant W. W. Grainger, Inc. (Gerak, John) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon W. W. Grainger, Inc. on 7/3/2018, filed on behalf of Amanda Benedict. Related document(s) #2 . (S,HR) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to W. W. Grainger, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7017 3380 0000 7266 5650. (P,G) |
| Filing 3 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 6/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List)(P,J) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon W. W. Grainger, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (D,JJ) |
| Filing 1 Class and Collective Action Complaint with jury demand against W. W. Grainger, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8775228. Filed by Amanda Benedict. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Consent of Amanda Benedict) (Nilges, Hans). |
| Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (D,JJ) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (D,JJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Benedict v. W. W. Grainger, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: W. W. Grainger, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John Gerak |
| Represented By: | Henry F. Galatz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda Benedict | |
| Represented By: | Hans A. Nilges |
| Represented By: | Shannon M. Draher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
