Church v. Gray
| James E. Church |
| Warden David Gray |
| 5:2018cv02389 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| David A Ruiz |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by James E. Church. (Document Unsigned). Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(T,Je)
|
|
Filing 4
Attorney Appearance by Maura O'Neill Jaite filed by on behalf of David Gray. (Jaite, Maura)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent to file an answer ("Return of Writ") to the petition within 60 days from the date of this order; Petitioner to file an answer by way of a Traverse within 30 days from the filing of Respondent's answer; Respondent to respond within 15 days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 10/18/2018. (G,CA)
|
|
Copy of #3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to James E. Church #(A)684-897 Belmont Correctional Institution P.O. Box 540 St. Clairsville, OH 43950; David Gray Warden Belmont Correctional Institution P.O. Box 540 St. Clairsville, OH 43950; and emailed to the Office of the Attorney General on 10/18/2018. (G,CA)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 10/17/18. (K,C)
|
|
Filing 2
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,TL)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid, $5.00, receipt # 54660006763 filed by James E. Church. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (M,TL)
|
|
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of both pages of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) and blank civil cover sheet mailed to James E. Church #(A)684-897, Belmont Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 on 10/15/2018. (M,TL)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (M,TL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Church v. Gray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James E. Church | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden David Gray | |
| Represented By: | Maura O'Neill Jaite |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
