Burciaga et al v. F.M.J. Restaurant, Inc. et al
Jessica Burciaga, Jamie Longoria, Katarina Van Derham, Masha Lund and Dessie Mitcheson |
F.M.J. Restaurant, Inc., Renato6, LTD and Royal Restaurant, Inc. |
5:2018cv02583 |
November 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. F.M.J. Restaurant, Inc. waiver sent on 11/9/2018, answer due 1/8/2019; Royal Restaurant, Inc. waiver sent on 11/9/2018, answer due 1/8/2019 filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Harman, David) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9001069.. Filed by Masha Lund, Jamie Longoria, Jessica Burciaga, Dessie Mitcheson, Katarina Van Derham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 Burciaga, #3 Exhibit 2 Lund, #4 Exhibit 3 Mitcheson, #5 Exhibit 4 Van Derham, #6 Exhibit 5 Burciaga, #7 Exhibit 6 Lund, #8 Exhibit 7 Mitcheson, #9 Exhibit 8 Van Derham, #10 Exhibit 9 Longoria) (Harman, David) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (M,TL) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.