Fafrak v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Denise Fafrak |
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and The PNC Services Group, Inc. and Affiliates Long Term Disabilty Plan |
5:2018cv02752 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by The PNC Services Group, Inc. and Affiliates Long Term Disabilty Plan. (Bulea, Donald) |
Filing 13 Motion to dismiss count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant The PNC Services Group, Inc. and Affiliates Long Term Disabilty Plan. Related document(s) #10 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bulea, Donald) |
Filing 12 Answer to #10 Amended complaint filed by The PNC Services Group, Inc. and Affiliates Long Term Disabilty Plan. (Bulea, Donald) |
Filing 11 Marginal Entry Order granting Defendant's second #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston answer due 1/24/2019. Judge John R. Adams on 1/2/19.(K,C) |
Filing 10 First Amended complaint against All Plaintiffs. Filed by Denise Fafrak. (Mikulka, Angela) |
Filing 9 Motion for leave filed by Plaintiff Denise Fafrak. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order JE)(Mikulka, Angela) |
Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 2/19/2019 at 02:00 PM at Courtroom 575 before Judge John R. Adams. Lead counsel and party representatives must attend. Judge John R. Adams on 12/30/18. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties, #2 Rule 30.1, #3 Consent to Magistrate Judge, #4 Budget, #5 Policy and Procedure Manual)(K,C) |
Filing 7 Acknowledgment of receipt of state court records on 12/18/18 from Portage County Court of Common Pleas. Related document(s) #5 . (M,TL) |
Filing 6 Unopposed Second Motion for extension of time until January 24, 2019 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bulea, Donald) |
Filing 5 State court documents received from Portage County Court of Common Pleas, case #2018CV00856. Original record returned to Portage County Court with acknowledgment of receipt enclosed. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgment Letter) (M,TL) |
Filing 4 Marginal Entry Order granting Defendant's #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston answer due 1/3/2019. Judge John R. Adams on 12/6/18.(K,C) |
Filing 3 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until January 3, 2019 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bulea, Donald) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Portage County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018CV00856 Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9029342.. Filed by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint (State Court), #3 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal (State Court)) (Bulea, Donald) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.