Power of the Pen v. United Fellowship of the Pen dba PenOhio et al
Power of the Pen |
Thomas J. Merrill, Citizen X Incorporated dba PENOHIO, United Fellowship of the Pen dba PenOhio, Citizen X Incorporated and United Fellowship of the Pen |
5:2018cv02882 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Answer to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Citizen X Incorporated. (Mazgaj, Frank) |
Filing 8 Marginal Entry Order granting Defendants' #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Citizen X Incorporated answer due 2/13/2019; Thomas J. Merrill answer due 2/13/2019; United Fellowship of the Pen answer due 2/13/2019.Judge John R. Adams on 1/17/19.(K,C) |
Filing 7 Motion for extension of time until February 13, 2019 to answer Complaint filed by Citizen X Incorporated, Thomas J. Merrill, United Fellowship of the Pen. (Mazgaj, Frank) |
Filing 6 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Citizen X Incorporated on 12/27/2018 (at both addresses) ; Thomas J. Merrill (Market St. address) on 12/27/2018; United Fellowship of the Pen on 12/27/2018 (E. Market St. address), no delivery date on green cards, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Power of the Pen. Related document #2 . (M,TL) |
Filing 5 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Power of the Pen. (Duncan, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Power of the Pen. (Duncan, Matthew) |
Filing 3 Jury Demand filed by Power of the Pen. (Duncan, Matthew) |
Service by Clerk. Summons, Complaint, Consent to Magistrate Judge, Notice of Jury Demand, Corporate Disclosure Statement and Report on Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark addressed to Citizen X Incorporated (receipt #7012 2920 0000 5243 9219 - P.O. Box 13291, #7012 2920 0000 5243 9240 - E. Market St.), Thomas J. Merrill (receipt #7012 2920 0000 5243 9196 - Castle Blvd., #7012 2920 0000 5243 9233 - E. Market St.), United Fellowship of the Pen (receipt #7012 2920 0000 5243 9226 - Market St. - #7012 2920 0000 5243 9202 - Castle Blvd.) placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (M,TL) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Citizen X Incorporated (at P.O. Box 13291 & E. Market St.), Thomas J. Merrill (at Castle Blvd. & E. Market St.), United Fellowship of the Pen (at Castle Blvd. & E. Market St.). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Complaint (Trademark Infringement, Trademark Dilution, Unfair Competition, Tortious Interference with Business Relationships, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets) against Citizen X Incorporated, Thomas J. Merrill, United Fellowship of the Pen. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9055093, filed by Power of the Pen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Patent and Trademark Registration Numbers, #2 Exhibit B Infringing Design Drawing, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons) (Duncan, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.